This item is not eligible for coupon offers.

Bram Stoker's Dracula

Bram Stoker's Dracula

Director: Francis Ford Coppola Cast: Gary Oldman, Winona Ryder, Anthony Hopkins

4K Ultra HD (Blu-ray - Anniversary Edition / Wide Screen / 2 PACK / with Blu-ray)

$18.89 $26.99 Save 30% Current price is $18.89, Original price is $26.99. You Save 30%.
View All Available Formats & Editions
Choose Expedited Shipping at checkout for guaranteed delivery by Friday, November 15


Based on Bram Stoker's classic 1897 novel, this film from Francis Ford Coppola and screenwriter James Victor Hart offers a full-blooded portrait of the immortal Transylvanian vampire. The major departure from Stoker is one of motivation as Count Dracula (Gary Oldman) is motivated more by romance than by bloodlust. He punctures the necks as a means of avenging the death of his wife in the 15th century, and when he comes to London, it is specifically to meet heroine Mina Harker (Winona Ryder), the living image of his late wife (Ryder plays a dual role, as do several of her costars). Anthony Hopkins is obsessed vampire hunter Van Helsing, while Keanu Reeves takes on the role of Jonathan Harker, and Tom Waits plays bug-eating Renfield. Bram Stoker's Dracula was the winner of three Academy Awards.

Product Details

Release Date: 10/03/2017
UPC: 0043396499157
Original Release: 1992
Rating: R
Source: Sony Pictures
Presentation: [Wide Screen]
Time: 2:07:00
Format: Blu-ray
Sales rank: 4,601

Cast & Crew

Performance Credits
Gary Oldman Count Vlad Dracul/Dracula
Winona Ryder Mina Murray/Elisabeta
Anthony Hopkins Professor Abraham Van Helsing
Keanu Reeves Jonathan Harker
Richard Grant Dr. Jack Seward
Sadie Frost Lucy Westenra
Cary Elwes Lord Arthur Holmwood
Bill Campbell Quincey P. Morris
Tom Waits R.M. Renfield
Monica Bellucci Dracula's Bride
Jay Robinson Mr. Hawkins
Don W. Lewis Shadow Puppeteer
James Murray Actor
Fred Spencer Shadow Puppeteer
Victoria Thomas Actor
Tatiana Von Furstenberg Younger Woman
Jules Sylvester Zoo Keeper
I.M. Hobson Hobbs
Laurie Frank Lucy's Maid
Maud Winchester Downstairs Maid
Robert Getz Priest
Hubert Wells Zoo Keeper
Daniel Newman News Hawker
Robert Buckingham Husband
Cully Fredricksen Van Helsing's Assistant

Technical Credits
Francis Ford Coppola Director,Producer
Michael Apted Executive Producer
Michael Ballhaus Cinematographer
David M. Dunlap Camera Operator
Tony Epper Stunts
Fred Fuchs Producer
Anne Goursaud Editor
Jim V. Hart Co-producer,Screenwriter
Eiko Ishioka Costumes/Costume Designer
Wojciech Kilar Score Composer
Susan B. Landau Associate Producer
Garrett Lewis Set Decoration/Design
Charles B. Mulvehill Producer
Matthew Mungle Makeup
Robert O'Connor Executive Producer
Andrew Precht Art Director
Thomas Sanders Production Designer
Glen Scantlebury Editor
Nicholas C. Smith Editor
David E. Stone Makeup
John Patrick Veitch Co-producer,Screenwriter

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

See All Customer Reviews

Bram Stoker's Dracula 4.3 out of 5 based on 0 ratings. 65 reviews.
Mina_Dark More than 1 year ago
This has been one of my favorite films for about the past 13 years. (Yes, I know I'm a slacker, but I just thought of doing a review for it.) Gary Oldman has always been my favorite actor, even before Dracula (State of Grace, Criminal Law, etc.) and he was the perfect casting choice for the most famous vampire. His command of accents was clear and impressive in this film, and he ruled the show with his performance all around. Anthony Hopkins was fantastic as Van Helsing, obviously, and added a new creepy element to the environment. The three suitors of Lucy were excellent and added humor to the otherwise dark script. What was terrible was the casting of Reeves and Ryder. What was the casting driector THINKING!!!??? They are both terrible actors to begin with, and can't do period films to save their lives. Their accents were terrible and oh-so-fake. Had it not been for Oldman and Hopkins, the two of them would've ruined the film. The only reason they were cast, clearly, was to bring in the teeny-bopper crowd while the film was in the theater. SAD! Yes, this film was very different from the novel, but I felt that the artistic approach was excellently done, and since it's a completely different form of media, the film should be seen as itself, not in comparison to something else. (To all the novel fans out there, I know it's difficult. I'm such a reader.) Anyway, I doubt there's many people who haven't seen this, but if you're one of them, see it at least once!
Guest More than 1 year ago
1462, Transylvania, Vlad the Impaler leaves his wife to fight the Turks. Out of malice, The Turks send her a letter telling her that her husband is dead. She is so distraught over his death and terrified at being captured that she throws herself from the castle turrets. When Vlad returns, he is told that his wife may not enter the Kingdom of Heaven as she has killed herself, which is a mortal sin. Vlad immediately renounces God and then he himself is condemned. 400 years later, Jonathon Harker leaves London and his fiancée Mina to travel to Transylvania. He has been assigned to help Count Dracula acquire property in England. Jonathon may never return… This film, despite its flaws, will always hold a place in my heart as it inspired me to write my novel, Vrolok. I have always loved horror movies so when I heard that Francis Ford Coppola was making a new Dracula film, I could not wait to see it. I remember eagerly anticipating the announcement of who was to play Dracula, and when I found out that it was Gary Oldman, I was not happy! The only thing I had seen him in was JFK, and I was not very impressed (I was too young to have appreciated Sid and Nancy). However, I still decided it was worth going to the cinema to see the movie as Keanu Reeves, Cary Elwes and Bill Campbell were also in it. From the moment Gary Oldman appears on screen, he captivates his audience. His performance is camp, overdone, and at times preposterous, yet it is still somehow seductive, mesmerizing, and sublime. (Bram Stoker would have been proud!). He even utters the line “The children of the night. What sweet music they make” with a thick Romanian accent and gets away with it. I saw this film when I was fifteen and was immediately converted into a life long Gary Oldman fan. As previously stated, and despite Oldman’s performance, the film does have its flaws. Keanu Reeves is about as wooden as a stake and the rest of the cast seem to, just like Gary Oldman, overdo the accents and this is a strategy that doesn’t quite work for the rest of the cast. In addition, Sadie Frost and Wynona Ryder running around in the rain in see-through outfits is clichéd and slightly annoying (I am sure most boys who see this film love that bit). Apart from Oldman’s performance, there is one other thing that has to be commended – the soundtrack – both Wojciech Kilar's score and Annie Lennox’s theme are dark, chilling, and poignant. All in all a great movie – it inspired me to write a book that may or may not make me a million but will always be something that I am proud to have completed.
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
a great vampire movie! ...... i say is the castle far?.. that was so funny lol!.. i would of said "excuse me how far is castle dracula?" or" how much longer 2 castle dracula?" but i still liked the movie 4 it's dark side & the good special effects. and gary oldman gave a great proformance so did anthony hopkins. i loved the special scene with gary & winona when he wanted 2 make her his 4ver, so right that moment he was ready & willing 2 turn her but he loved her so much that he couldn't so he told her i can't i love 2 much 2 condemned you but she refused & said take me away from all this death!..oh what a scene!............. is true love never dies.
SleepDreamWrite More than 1 year ago
Some of the acting was either good, not that good or over the top. Interesting but a little weird.
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
A classic that has been so well interpreted that it haunted me long afterwards.
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
Guest More than 1 year ago
Hell, what can i say? The effects were great but it left something to desire. I loved how the actors fit their roles perfectly, I felt that they could have done a better job at making it more realistic. I am a big fan of Anthony Hopkins, but I believe that this was not one of his best acting jobs. But, if you like erotic horror, or just awesome special effects you'll like this movie. The book is much better.
Guest More than 1 year ago
I watched this movie last night. It was all right. I think the director should have done a better job of directing it. The directing looked really cheap, like it was a fake set or something. ANd the director of this movie directed The Godfather movies. The movie got really graphic and pornographic at some points. Gary Oldman did a really good job as dracula. I think it was good but needed a little more work. The good thing about it was, they stayed very close to the book. I still, think the original with Bela Lugosi was the best one still. SO if you like Dracula, you might like this one.
Math_prime More than 1 year ago
Coppola's "Bram Stoker's Dracula" is simply excellent. The film accurately follows the original story and it includes a brief story of why and how Dracula became a vampire; both are seamlessly blended, which also offers an understanding of Mina Harker's sympathy that goes beyond being seduced by evil. The movie is fast-paced, unlike Bram Stoker's novel being told mostly through letters and diary entries that accurately depicts the speed of communication in the late 1800's.
nellyvc More than 1 year ago
a pesar de que la pelicula es "vieja" los efectos son MUY buenos, no le pide nada a los efectos especiales que vemos hoy en dia
Guest More than 1 year ago
Bram Stoker's Dracula is one of the finest adaptions for Stoker's immortal tale. Gary Oldman IS Dracula. His performance is one of his best. Winona Ryder is a wonderful Mina Murray. Anthony Hopkins is fantastic as always. Keanu Reeves is just bad in every way except for a some good scenes. Sadie Frost is one of the best vixens in a vampire movie ever. This is a movie a horror/drama/romance fan should check out.
Guest More than 1 year ago
I saw this movie the day it was originally released, and I am not sorry that I did. What got me was the fact that a man could be so deeply in love with his wife that he would search not just across the earth (well, from Romania to England) but across centuries for his one true love. I felt that the actors did their roles justice. Gary Oldman's performance was so good in that he portrayed his character with such intensity and yearning that you could actually feel the emotions, including great love and great heartache, as if they were pouring from the screen. There is some sexuality and nudity that might be a bit much for younger audiences, but otherwise it is a great film and I highly recommend it.
Guest More than 1 year ago
I watched this movie because I greatly enjoyed the original book. To say that I was disapointed with the outcome of this movie would be an understatement. The changes between the movie and the book are marked and obvious. The amount of sexual content was amazing. Content wise this is not all that great of a movie. However, the costumes special effects and so on are incredible. Anthony Hopkins does an exelent Van Helsing and Winona Ryder fits into her character like a second skin. Bottom line: Don't watch this because you liked the book, if you like special effects or lots of sexual junk this is the movie for you
Guest More than 1 year ago
O.K., that was a cheap shot ! But, Winona was pretty good in this adaptation. I enjoyed the movie, the subtlety of the gore (well, as such), and the stylishness (not to mention Playboy-type Vampiraas 'sucking' Keanu's 'blood'). Hmmmm ! Guess a little eroticism, nowadays, never hurt a PIX !!! I'm sure F.F.C. enjoyed that little 'scene' (hee, hee!)
Guest More than 1 year ago
Guest More than 1 year ago
This was the best dracula movie I've seen so far! It's like a gothic Romeo and Juliet at the beginning, only Romeo turns on God and is now a vampire. Trust me, it's way better then the way I just explained it!! I loved it, romance and vampires all in one.
kjhproductions More than 1 year ago
i loved this movie. it is kick but. my only complaint is the nudity in the film. my favoritte character is van hellsing
Guest More than 1 year ago
This is my favorite movie. It is a gothic love story and the best vampire movie I have ever seen. It's one of the few vampire movies that aren't cheesy and fake looking. So if you like vampires and love a good love story this is a great one!!!