The Secret History

The Secret History

by Donna Tartt


$13.80 $16.95 Save 19% Current price is $13.8, Original price is $16.95. You Save 19%. View All Available Formats & Editions
Choose Expedited Shipping at checkout for guaranteed delivery by Thursday, October 24


Donna Tartt, winner of the 2014 Pulitzer Prize for her most recent novel, The Goldfinch, established herself as a major talent with The Secret History, which has become a contemporary classic.

Under the influence of their charismatic classics professor, a group of clever, eccentric misfits at an elite New England college discover a way of thinking and living that is a world away from the humdrum existence of their contemporaries. But when they go beyond the boundaries of normal morality their lives are changed profoundly and forever, and they discover how hard it can be to truly live and how easy it is to kill.

Product Details

ISBN-13: 9781400031702
Publisher: Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group
Publication date: 04/13/2004
Series: Vintage Contemporaries Series
Edition description: Reprint
Pages: 576
Sales rank: 7,819
Product dimensions: 5.10(w) x 7.90(h) x 1.20(d)

About the Author

Donna Tartt won the 2014 Pulitzer Prize for her most recent Novel. The Goldfinch Her novelsl The Secret History and The Little Friend were also international bestsellers. She was born in Greenwood, Mississippi, and is a graduate of Bennington College.

Date of Birth:

December 23, 1963

Place of Birth:

Greenwood, Mississippi


Attended University of Mississippi; B.A., Bennington College, 1986

Read an Excerpt


Excerpted from "The Secret History"
by .
Copyright © 2004 Donna Tartt.
Excerpted by permission of Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group.
All rights reserved. No part of this excerpt may be reproduced or reprinted without permission in writing from the publisher.
Excerpts are provided by Dial-A-Book Inc. solely for the personal use of visitors to this web site.

What People are Saying About This

From the Publisher

The Secret History succeeds magnificently. . . . A remarkably powerful novel [and] a ferociously well-paced entertainment. . . . Forceful, cerebral, and impeccably controlled.” —The New York Times

“An accomplished psychological thriller. . . . Absolutely chilling. . . . Tartt has a stunning command of the lyrical.” —The Village Voice

“Beautifully written, suspenseful from start to finish.” —Vogue

“A haunting, compelling, and brilliant piece of fiction. . . . Packed with literary allusion and told with a sophistication and texture that owes much more to the nineteenth century than to the twentieth.” —The Times (London)

“Her writing bewitches us. . . . The Secret History is a wonderfully beguiling book, a journey backward to the fierce and heady friendships of our school days, when all of us believed in our power to conjure up divinity and to be forgiven any sin.” —The Philadephia Inquirer

“Enthralling. . . . A remarkably powerful novel [and] a ferociously wll-paced entertainment. . . . Forceful, cerebral, and impeccably controlled.” —The New York Times Book Review

“A huge, mesmerizing, galloping read, pleasurably devoured. . . . .Gorgeously written, relentlessly erudite.” –Vanity Fair

Reading Group Guide

1. Richard states that he ended up at Hampden College by a “trick of fate.” What do you think of this statement? Do you believe in fate?

2. When discussing Bacchae and the Dionysiac ritual with his students Julian states, “We don’t like to admit it, but the idea of losing control is one that fascinates controlled people such as ourselves more than almost anything. All truly civilized people—the ancients no less than us—have civilized themselves through the willful repression of the old, animal self” (p. 38). What is your opinion of this theory? Are we all attracted to that which is forbidden? Do we all secretly wish we could let ourselves go and act on our animal instincts? Is it true that “beauty is terror”?

3. “I suppose there is a certain crucial interval in everyone’s life when character is fixed forever: for me, it was that first fall term spent at Hampden” (p. 80). Did you have such a crucial interval in your life? What/when was it?

4. In the idyllic beginning it is easy to see why Richard is drawn to the group of Greek scholars. It is only after they begin to unravel that we see the sinister side of each of the characters. Do you think any one of the characters possesses true evil? Is there such a thing as true evil, or is there something redeeming in everyone’s character?

5. In the beginning of the novel, Bunny’s behavior is at times endearing and at others maddening. What was your initial opinion of Bunny? Does it change as the story develops?

6. At times Bunny, with his selfish behavior, seems devoid of a conscience, yet he is the most disturbed by the murder of the farmer. Is he more upset because he was left out of the group or because he feels what happened is wrong?

7. Henry says to Richard, “My life, for the most part, has been very stale and colorless. Dead, I mean. The world has always been an empty place to me. I was incapable of enjoying even the simplest things. I felt dead in everything I did. . . . But then it changed . . . The night I killed that man” (p. 463). How does Henry’s reaction compare to that of the others involved in the murder(s)? Do you believe he feels remorse for what he has done?

8. Discuss the significance of the scene in which Henry wipes his muddy hand across his shirt after throwing dirt onto Bunny’s coffin at the funeral (p. 395).

9. List some of the signs that foreshadowed the dark turn of events. Would you have seen all the signs that Richard initially misses? Or do you believe Richard knew all along and just refused to see the truth?

10. Would you have stuck by the group after learning their dark secret?

11. The author states that many people didn’t sympathize with Richard. Did you find him a sympathetic character?

12. What do you make of Richard’s unrequited love for Camilla? Do you feel that she loved him in return? Or did she use his love for her as a tool to manipulate him?

13. Do you feel the others used Richard as a pawn? If so, how?

14. What do you feel is the significance of Julian’s toast “Live forever” (p. 86)?

15. The author mentions a quote supposedly made by George Orwell regarding Julian: “Upon meeting Julian Morrow, one has the impression that he is a man of extraordinary sympathy and warmth. But what you call his ‘Asiatic Serenity’ is, I think, a mask for great coldness” (p. 480). What is your opinion of Julian?

16. Do you think that Julian feels he is somewhat responsible for the murder of Bunny? Is that why he doesn’t turn the group in when he discovers the truth from Bunny’s letter?

17. What causes Julian to flee? Is it because of disappointment in his young protegees or in himself?

18. While the inner circle of characters (Richard, Charles, Camilla, Henry, Francis, and the ill-fated Bunny) are the center of this tale, those on the periphery are equally important in their own ways (Judy Poovey, Cloke Rayburn, Marion, and so on). Discuss the roles of these characters.

19. The rights for The Secret History were initially purchased by director/producer/screenwriter Alan J. Paluka (All The President’s
Men, The Pelican Brief), and they are currently with director Scott Hicks (Shine, Snow Falling on Cedars). What are your feelings about making the novel into a movie? Who would play the main characters if you were to cast it?

20. What is the meaning of Richard’s final dream?

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

See All Customer Reviews

The Secret History 4.1 out of 5 based on 0 ratings. 277 reviews.
Guest More than 1 year ago
What makes 'The Secret History' such a compelling book is its daring to examine the consequences of the arrogance of intellectual superiority, something I struggled with in my youth, something which I sometimes find myself struggling with today. Those of us who were products of accelerated academic programs, who fell under the auspicious acronmym AP (for Advanced Placement) often felt removed from our peers and masked our underlying feelings of inferiority as erudite superiority. It is a defence mechanism many of us used when young,and sometimes continue to use as a means we tell ourselves of making us feel better about who we are. The students in TSH, even the sympathetic narrator Richard Papen, exemplify these ideas and the impulses these feelings cause them to act out are shown as having the direst of moral consequences to which they as a group and individually must answer for. The pleasures of intellectual stimulation coupled with the psychological underpinings of the deed done and how it is played out give TSH its literary resonance. In addition the book provides a builti in mystery of its own--namely the literary future, or if there is to be one, of its author, Donna Tartt. Upon a first reading nearly ten years ago, I embraced TSH and Donna Tartt as a voice I wanted to hear more of--a voice which has been noticeably and mysteriously silent, which has only served to build up the legend, and rumors of an impending second novel sometime next year. This remains to be seen but TSH continues to remain a book I turn to time and again for its exploration of moral arrogance and the destruction such attitudes can incur.
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
I read it 3 years ago and im back looking it up hoping to find some clues to another, similar book. I have found some people seem to not like it and that baffles me. Great mystery, suspense. I was genuinely sad it was finished when it was over.
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
A really tense mystery; well-defined characters. You want to reach out and implore them to stop. Intelligence and narcissism and exclusivity and wealth and bored youth are a dangerous mix.
capiam1234 More than 1 year ago
Sex, Murder, and Mystery, rich spoiled college kids take life for granted and ends up screwing it all up. Everyone has had that loathing at some point when you just wish that reality will slap someone in the face that really deserved it. Well here's your chance! Donna Tartt shows us the lives of Henry, Francis, Richard, Charles, Camilla, and Bunny and with such finesse describes the life in a Vermont college for these spoiled snobs. But wait...the characters tend to come to life thanks to Tartt's writing and we really hope that things work out for them in the end, but part of us just wants to drop an anvil on their heads! The descriptions that Tartt provides are incredible to say the least and the period of winter helplessness that Richard experiences chills you to the bone. "This was, I should say, about the third week in January. The thermometer was droping; my life, which before had been only solitary and miserable, became unbearable. Every day, in a daze, I walked to and from work, sometimes during weather that was ten or twenty below, sometimes during storms so heavy that all I could see was white, and the only way I made it home at all was by keeping close to the guard rail on the side if the road. Once home, I wrapped myself in my dirty blankets and fell on the floor like a dead man. All my moments were not consumed with efforts to escape the cold were absorbed with morbid Poe-like fancies. One night, in a dream, I saw my own corpse, hair stiff with ice and eyes wide open." I actually had to dress warmer while reading his experience in a cold dark apartment. Throughout the book you know Richard will witness some shocking discovery of what is really happening, and thanks to Tartt again this isn't just dropped on us suddenly. She rather slowly reveals each secret such subtleness that it builds to the climax in a way that you feel for these characters even though they are such selfish snobs. This is one of my favorite reads this year and will reside on my shelf for years to come.
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
The Secret History is an enigmatic blend of psychological thrills, an astoundingly complex, but realistic plot, and a rich vocabulary not often found in this day and age, wrapped in the wonder of Greek poetry and language. Upon my arrival of Julian's study room, I was instantly transported into a world shrouded in mystery. One characterized by dimly-lit lamps and persian rugs. By whispered betrayals behind callous-free hands and the eloquent discussions of one well-versed in the philosophies of the ancient world. Reading Tartt's work of literature was a quite enjoyable experience as she merged a world long gone with the one presently existing. She showed us beauty by kissing death. Showed us horror through fascination. She took all the elements of loathing, passion, revenge, morality, enlightenment, and unthinkable acts and mixed them around and around until you can no longer discern one from the other. Until you see that beauty and terror are one and the same. Not only does Tartt expertley portray this, but she does so with her uncanny ability to bring her characters to life, so that they might walk off the page at any given moment. If I was to summarize the plot right at this very moment, you would wonder at the sanity of the characters. However, should you read this literature in its entirety, you should find yourself just as confused and scared as the murderers themselves. I should like to reiterate one last time the beauty of the language used. I feel that much of our language today has been greatly reduced and watered down from, say, Shakespeare's age. A time when the crafting of words was regarded as an art form. With this novel, I believe Tartt was able to recapture some of that beauty that so many of our more recent novels have been missing. I truly loved this novel and find it completley worthy of the accolades it has recieved. This is not a light read, but if you're willing to endure a few late nights and a few hours lost sleep, I promise this is a book you won't want to put down.
Guest More than 1 year ago
THE SECRET HISTORY is that rarity published in recent years, a mainstream novel that deals with murder but not the usual ho-hum mystery formula. I was drawn into Richard Papen's slide into the small clique of classics students majoring in Greek, improbably taking no other courses but French in a small Vermont private college. Never fitting in other settings, Richard seems a perfect fit here, though his blue-collar background contrasts to the wealthy background of the other five. The coin is fluency in Greek, and the group considers themselves set apart by their intellectual superiority. Though one member is far from an intellectual, and his position becomes increasingly precarious after a mysterious killing of a local farmer prods him to blackmail and snipe at the others he is sure killed the man. Richard is the observer, who becomes an accessory to murder, under the spell of the group's leader, who is determined to conceal their crimes at all costs. Mesmerized by the leader's rationalization that the first killing was an accident--or was it?-- Richard goes along with the plan for a second murder, drifting with the others from the first in a haze of constant heavy drinking combined with drugs taken as a matter of course. While college students --at least some of them--certainly did drugs in the Eighties and probably still do, every character major or minor in the book is stoned and recklessly drunk on top of that. No one dies of this, a miracle; and such bright students in the Greek major seem to be drunk or on their way much of the time--not terribly intellectual, though bright people often drink to excess at times. Not even Richard can work up actual horror at news of the first killing, or resistance to the plan to cover up by killing the second victim, chiefly because said victim's needling gets more and more annoying. Yet this reader, usually repelled by conscienceless characters, was unable to put the book down, wanting to know if they will get away with it, wanting to know what Richard--who hasn't actually committed either murder--will do in the end or if he will end up in prison for his complicity in abetting and concealing the crimes. The alarmingly plausible leader's essential evil is slowly and skillfully revealed by the author, who turned out a literate and vivid work of prose in THE SECRET HISTORY. The end had one small flaw, hard to understand the leader's action in the climax. It didn't seem in character. But the book was haunting and involving, and I'll look for more of Donna Tartt's work.
RedNib More than 1 year ago
Few months ago I have come across a book by the same author titled "The Goldfinch". I couldn't put it down and was left with a thirst to experience that kind of immersion once more. I researched the author and out of the two remaining books decided to read this one. My thirst was certainly quenched. I couldn't put the book down; I tried to slow down and absorb the beautiful language and vivid descriptions but the plot kept on sweeping me away. The characters, their unexpected development, naked honesty of the central character, the path the story weaved through my mind-all were unforgettable. I am still mulling over the thoughts this book provoked, the emotions it aroused in me, the ideas about human nature I was forced to explore. All the while the book was set in such a bucolic scene that I longed for the quite unhurried world of literary academia; wished for the kind of inspirational stimulus that the teacher/mentor provided these characters. Only to discover in the end that how we see people and our interactions with them and each other is simply a hall of mirrors with reflections seen influenced by what we want and not want to see; and not at all by the true nature of whatever is standing in front of that mirror. This would be a great book to explore at the book club.
markfinl on LibraryThing More than 1 year ago
I really wanted to like this book, but I couldn't. This is the story of a group of wealthy college students who kill one of their classmates to keep him from revealing another killing committed by the group. The story is told by Richard, the outsider of the group. There are so many problems with this book. The characters are effete and pretentious to the point of parody, but there is not a hint of irony to the book; the narration is deadly serious (no pun intended) throughout. The murdered character is the most unlikable of the bunch, so the reader has little sympathy for his demise. The writing is turgid and lifeless. Compare with Special Topics in Calamity Physics, a book that shares many of the plot points with The Secret History. That book sparkles with wit and inventiveness on nearly every page.
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
"The illogic of it frightened them and they did everything they could to crush it. In fact, I think the reason they took such drastic steps was because they were not only frightened but also terribly attracted to it." Donna Tartt, The Secret History This is absolutely one of the most addictive and honest works I've read. The students in this novel dance along the edge of monomania; they serve as an escape from rational life and engross attention in their idiosyncrasy. There is no room for critique of Tartt's carefully constructed novel. If you are searching for your favorite modern piece, The Secret History will not disappoint.
BrianTX More than 1 year ago
I first heard about this book from an article written by J.K. Rowling in The University of Exeter’s magazine Pegasus in which she described The Secret History as “an undeniable page-turner.” I now find myself inclined to agree with her. Sometimes later I read a free sample on my Nook and wasn’t very impressed – the university setting in which the story takes place seemed really unbelievable and kind of cheesy. After a recommendation from friend, however, I continued to read the whole thing and found that it was one of the most entertaining books I had ever read. It’s no masterwork of literature, but it’s definitely worth the read. It’s exciting; the characters are so well crafted that it’ll be very hard for any reader not to get attached to them. I purchased the Nook book and it was formatted very nicely without any problems.
cloggiedownunder More than 1 year ago
“…people never seemed to notice at first how big Henry was. Maybe it was because of his clothes, which were like one of those lame but curiously impenetrable disguises from a comic book (why does no one ever see that ‘bookish’ Clark Kent, without his glasses, is Superman?). Or maybe it was a question of his making people see. He had the far more remarkable talent of making himself invisible – in a room, in a car, a virtual ability to dematerialise at will – and perhaps this gift was only the converse of that one: the sudden concentration of his wandering molecules rendering his shadowy form solid, all at once, a metamorphosis startling the viewer.” The Secret History is the first novel by American author, Donna Tartt. At the age of nineteen, Richard Papen goes to Hampden College in Vermont, primarily to get away from his parents and his depressingly boring hometown of Plano, CA. Having done two years of study in Ancient Greek, he jumps at the opportunity to join an exclusive class of five students studying The Classics under the very selective Julian Morrow. Richard is somewhat dazzled by his fellow students: Henry Winter, dark-suited, stiff, aloof and extremely intelligent; Francis Abernathy, angular and elegant; the beautiful twins, Charles and Camilla Macaulay, and Bunny Corcoran, loud and cheery. Never does he dream that within a few months, one of their number will be dead. At the centre of this book, both figuratively and literally, is a murder. The narrative is split into two: what led up to the murder, and the aftermath. The story is told by Richard some nine years after he went to Vermont. Tartt advances her story at a slow and careful pace; her characters, flawed and not necessarily appealing, develop as Richard gets to know them; her descriptive prose expertly evokes the atmosphere of the New England college. So naturally do events lead into one another that the reader occasionally needs to step back and think: this is murder they are so matter-of-factly discussing. Black humour relieves the tension: the twins, upbraided for their failure to plan a meal, retort “Well, if you wake up intending to murder someone at two o’clock, you hardly think what you’re going to feed the corpse for dinner”. As well as giving the reader plenty to think about (the value of life, self-preservation, friendship any loyalty), there is a plot with a few interesting turns and a quite unexpected climax. Tartt combines the story-telling talent of Stephen King with prose worthy of Wallace Stegner: the result is a compelling read that will stay with the reader long after the last page is turned.
Aiea More than 1 year ago
Slow going, almost gave up on it. Read it because of a review of the sequel that interested me but now not sure about trying to read that.
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
Another--and her first--thrilling story you cannot put down! And yes, a lot of ingredients are similar: an immature young man with incompetent parents, interesting bad friends, a distinguished older mentor, lots of drugs, love, betrayal, suspense, tragedy, unthinkable actions...
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
I resented spending time with these insufferable self absorbed miscreants
emily_reads More than 1 year ago
This complex novel is slow-moving at times, but it is very rewarding. If you like this book, check out Carol Goodman's Lake of Dead Languages. Follow me on twitter!
Anonymous 8 months ago
Anonymous 10 months ago
this book is 200 pages too long
PAPatrick on LibraryThing More than 1 year ago
It was her freshman novel and it bode so well .... Have you ever wanted to know what the school cliques of Goths or science nerds get up to when they feel themselves both isolated and elite? Tartt gives us a suspense novel wherein an exclusive university Classics study group decides to do away with a member, Eleusinian-mysteries-style. Its premise and characters makes it interesting; there's nothing radically different about the unfolding of the plot. Engrossing but not a revelation.
ReginaR on LibraryThing More than 1 year ago
This book embodies everything that I love in fiction, it is a perfect example of why I love to read. Every word and phrase that appears on the pages of this book (and it is pages, as this book is not available in ebook format as of yet!) is so beautiful and so rich. Everytime I sat down to read this book, I felt as if I was in the midst of eating a perfectly cooked filet mignon and a very rich but salty potato side dish accompanied by a strong red wine. This book was a true treat for my senses. It is a character driven book, the characters are central and the tale is about them ¿ not about their surroundings or their events. It is the characters that rule this tale. So what was this book about? Excess, consumption, greed, selfishness, loss of innocence, pack think and ego maniacs ¿ sound delicious? The setting for this tale is a small, secluded (and mythical) Vermont liberal arts college populated by elite students. The story is told from the point of view of a male transfer student who is running from his blue collar background and his disinterested parents. He escapes into a group of students who have further secluded themselves from the student body even more in this remote environment. Richard ¿ the protagonist ¿ begins to study classics, focusing on Greek and attempts to pretend he is someone he is not - privileged, wealthy, elite. The circle of friends he finds himself among, appear to all be very wealthy and focused on academics in a way that is very odd for modern college students. They are extremely insular, not willing to permit anyone into their ranks. Richard, now admitted after he demonstrates his knowledge of ancient Greek, begins crafting himself in the image of those around him. The opening scene (in fact the prologue) begins with a murder scene, there is no mystery here. The reader knows who dies and how. The murderers are clear, there is no question as to motive. The focus of the story are the events leading up to the murder and the murders aftermath on its participants. What Tartt unwraps for the reader is a very disturbing tale. Will a need to fit in trump morality? What needs to happen for a person to separate from a group focused on hurting those around them? Or will most people just follow the group, no matter the evil effects on those around them? What is the greater good ¿ is it the survival of a group of friends? The story is about loss of innocence, the extreme focus inward to the neglect of else, and group think. It is a beautiful and haunting tale. I thoroughly enjoyed every minute spent reading this book. Readers who enjoyed Tana French¿s The Likeness, will enjoy this book.
vivycakes on LibraryThing More than 1 year ago
Good read. I really enjoyed the writing. You know from the very beginning that a small group of friends had murdered one of their own. The narrator is Richard, who is a late addition to the clique. This is one of those novels where "nothing happens" because it isn't really about the crime, but rather the relationship dynamics around it and and its psychological aftermath. Unfortunately, the most dramatic events largely happen behind the scenes due to Richard's point of view. His new friends hide their strange activities & conflicts from him for much of the novel. They only gradually start confiding in him after the fact, and then he is given a very vague idea of what was going on. I found that vagueness very unsatisfying. It was still a really good read, and I can see myself rereading it at some point. (I rarely ever reread novels). The first half was terrific, the second half dragged a bit.
RDHawk6886 on LibraryThing More than 1 year ago
A very engaging and well written entertainment. It's as if the cast of Metropolitan were involved in the murder of one of their own. Hard to classify, the book operates on several levels. This is not a novel of mystery or suspense. It is more a character study, that does a credible job of capturing the mindsets, emotions and interpersonal relationships that populate college life, placed in the context of extreme circumstances. In sensibility, I would place it closest to Tom Wolfe's last novel, "I am Charlotte Simmons" couple with Tana French's first two books. Also very witty and humorous. I am waiting for Whit Stillman to direct the movie.
stevanderman on LibraryThing More than 1 year ago
Though I largley enjoyed this book, I couldn't help but feel that Tartt missed some great opportunities within her own work. For such a pivotal figure in the group's lives Julian was barely present, even when he discovers for himself the truth behind Bunny's death, instead of offering any response he simply disappears from the book. Though a darkness resides in just about every character within the book (in the group anyway) it never seemed fully explored by Tartt, the gruesome death of the farmer was beyond memory recall, the incestuous relationship between Charles and Camilla only surfaces towards the book's end. Pointless passages flooded the book such as the weekend surrounding Bunny's funeral and the break from school where Richard spends his time sauntering between college and his run down abode.It was however exceptionally well written and as i say, I did enjoy it.
etimme on LibraryThing More than 1 year ago
I enjoyed the first half of the book quite a bit more than the second half, which was more concerned with the ideas of grief and remorse. Tartt does a great job introducing us to the characters Richard grows to know in a way that makes you feel like you're meeting them in the same way as the narrator - gradually and imperfectly. I liked the apathy and listless way everyone went through their time at Hampden College, and how flawed and screwed up these priveleged kids ended up being.Still, with the exception of Henry, they all seemed to have some kind of moral compass, despite their excesses and cruelty. I might have liked the story more if they had all been sociopaths out of a Bret Easton Ellis novel, with Richard as the moral center of the group trying to come to terms with this terrible act, but the story was fine as it was told.
natarsha on LibraryThing More than 1 year ago
A good read. The story kept me interested, even though the prologue gave away the plot line and even though the book was more than 600 pages long. The main characters of the novel are studying Ancient Greek and I enjoyed the way that the themes of fate, Greek tragedy and literature were peppered throughout the book.
dortheabooks on LibraryThing More than 1 year ago
One of the most overrated books I've ever read.